Toyota Hilux Extra Cab (2015 – 2017) vs Mazda BT-50 (2015 – 2018): specs compared
The Mazda BT-50 is the more powerful of the two, with up to 200 hp against 170 hp. The Toyota Hilux Extra Cab uses less fuel, from 7.0 L/100 km against 7.6 L/100 km. The Mazda BT-50 is the lighter car, from 1,622 kg against 1,770 kg.
| Specification |
Toyota
Hilux Extra Cab
2015 – 2017
|
Mazda
BT-50
2015 – 2018
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | Japan | Japan |
| Documented years | 2015 – 2017 | 2015 – 2018 |
| Body style | — | — |
| Variants | 4 | 13 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive | RWD · AWD | RWD · AWD |
| Gearbox | Manual | Automatic · Manual |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 150 – 170 hp | 150 – 200 hp |
| Torque | 343 – 400 Nm | 375 – 470 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | 13.2 s | — |
| Top speed | 171 km/h | — |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 7.0 – 7.1 L/100 km | 7.6 – 9.2 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5,329 mm | 5,123 – 5,372 mm |
| Width | 1,801 – 1,854 mm | 1,849 mm |
| Height | 1,699 – 1,811 mm | 1,801 – 1,816 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,086 mm | 3,221 mm |
| Curb weight | 1,770 – 1,990 kg | 1,622 – 2,056 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.
More comparisons
Toyota Hilux Extra Cab vs Nissan Navara / Frontier Double CabToyota Hilux Extra Cab vs Renault AlaskanToyota Hilux Extra Cab vs Ford Ranger Regular CabToyota Hilux Extra Cab vs Isuzu Rodeo / D-MaxToyota Hilux Extra Cab vs Nissan Navara / Frontier King CabMazda BT-50 vs Ford Ranger Double CabMazda BT-50 vs Ford Ranger Super CabMazda BT-50 vs Renault Alaskan