Ford Ranger Double Cab (2015 – 2018) vs Mazda BT-50 (2015 – 2018): specs compared
Both offer around 200 hp at most. The Ford Ranger Double Cab uses less fuel, from 6.5 L/100 km against 7.6 L/100 km. The Mazda BT-50 is the lighter car, from 1,622 kg against 1,883 kg.
| Specification |
Ford
Ranger Double Cab
2015 – 2018
|
Mazda
BT-50
2015 – 2018
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | United States | Japan |
| Documented years | 2015 – 2018 | 2015 – 2018 |
| Body style | Pickup | — |
| Variants | 7 | 13 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive | RWD · AWD | RWD · AWD |
| Gearbox | Automatic · Manual | Automatic · Manual |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 160 – 200 hp | 150 – 200 hp |
| Torque | 385 – 470 Nm | 375 – 470 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | 10.6 – 12.8 s | — |
| Top speed | 175 km/h | — |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 6.5 – 8.9 L/100 km | 7.6 – 9.2 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5,362 mm | 5,123 – 5,372 mm |
| Width | 1,976 mm | 1,849 mm |
| Height | 1,816 mm | 1,801 – 1,816 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,221 mm | 3,221 mm |
| Curb weight | 1,883 – 2,167 kg | 1,622 – 2,056 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.
More comparisons
Ford Ranger Double Cab vs Nissan Navara / Frontier Double CabFord Ranger Double Cab vs Renault AlaskanFord Ranger Double Cab vs Toyota Hilux Double CabMazda BT-50 vs Ford Ranger Super CabMazda BT-50 vs Renault AlaskanMazda BT-50 vs Toyota Hilux Extra CabMazda BT-50 vs Nissan Navara / Frontier Double CabMazda BT-50 vs Toyota Hilux Double Cab