Mazda CX-9 (2009 – 2012) vs Suzuki Equator (2009 – 2012): specs compared
The Mazda CX-9 is the more powerful of the two, with up to 273 hp against 261 hp. It uses less fuel, from 13.0 L/100 km against 13.4 L/100 km. The Suzuki Equator is the lighter car, from 1,672 kg against 1,964 kg. At 5,248 mm, the Suzuki Equator is 158 mm longer than the Mazda CX-9.
| Specification |
Mazda
CX-9
2009 – 2012
|
Suzuki
Equator
2009 – 2012
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | Japan | Japan |
| Documented years | 2009 – 2012 | 2009 – 2012 |
| Body style | — | — |
| Variants | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Drive | AWD | RWD · AWD |
| Gearbox | Automatic | Automatic · Manual |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 277 hp | 152 – 264 hp |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 232 – 381 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | 10.1 s | — |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | — |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 13.0 L/100 km | 13.4 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5,090 mm | 5,248 mm |
| Width | 1,935 mm | 1,849 mm |
| Height | 1,727 mm | 1,770 – 1,781 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | — |
| Curb weight | 1,964 – 2,040 kg | 1,672 – 1,964 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.