Mazda CX-9 (2009 – 2012) vs Nissan Navara / Frontier King Cab (2009 – 2018): specs compared
The Mazda CX-9 is the more powerful of the two, with up to 273 hp against 261 hp. The Nissan Navara / Frontier King Cab is quicker, reaching 100 km/h in 8.3 s against 10.1 s. The Mazda CX-9 has the higher top speed: 180 km/h against 170 km/h. The Nissan Navara / Frontier King Cab uses less fuel, from 9.8 L/100 km against 13.0 L/100 km. The Mazda CX-9 is the lighter car, from 1,964 kg against 2,072 kg. At 5,220 mm, the Nissan Navara / Frontier King Cab is 130 mm longer than the Mazda CX-9.
| Specification |
Mazda
CX-9
2009 – 2012
|
Nissan
Navara / Frontier King Cab
2009 – 2018
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | Japan | Japan |
| Documented years | 2009 – 2012 | 2009 – 2018 |
| Body style | — | — |
| Variants | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel | Petrol | Diesel |
| Drive | AWD | AWD |
| Gearbox | Automatic | Automatic · Manual |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 277 hp | 150 – 264 hp |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 381 – 403 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | 10.1 s | 8.3 – 11.8 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 13.0 L/100 km | 9.8 – 14.3 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5,090 mm | 5,220 mm |
| Width | 1,935 mm | 1,849 mm |
| Height | 1,727 mm | 1,783 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 3,198 mm |
| Curb weight | 1,964 – 2,040 kg | 2,072 – 2,112 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.
More comparisons
Mazda CX-9 vs Honda Accord CrosstourMazda CX-9 vs Honda RidgelineMazda CX-9 vs Toyota SiennaMazda CX-9 vs Volkswagen RoutanMazda CX-9 vs Suzuki EquatorNissan Navara / Frontier King Cab vs Honda OdysseyNissan Navara / Frontier King Cab vs Honda PilotNissan Navara / Frontier King Cab vs Honda Ridgeline