Mitsubishi Mirage (2012 – 2016) vs Škoda Citigo (2012 – 2017): specs compared
Both offer around 77 hp at most. The Mitsubishi Mirage uses less fuel, from 3.6 L/100 km against 4.0 L/100 km. It is the lighter car, from 860 kg against 929 kg. At 3,711 mm, the Mitsubishi Mirage is 147 mm longer than the Škoda Citigo.
| Specification |
Mitsubishi
Mirage
2012 – 2016
|
Škoda
Citigo
2012 – 2017
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | Japan | Czech Republic |
| Documented years | 2012 – 2016 | 2012 – 2017 |
| Body style | — | — |
| Variants | 3 | 6 |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Drive | FWD | FWD |
| Gearbox | Automatic · Manual | Automatic · Manual |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 69 – 77 hp | 60 – 75 hp |
| Torque | 85 – 100 Nm | 95 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | — | 13.2 – 14.4 s |
| Top speed | — | 159 – 172 km/h |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 3.6 – 4.6 L/100 km | 4.0 – 4.7 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 3,711 mm | 3,564 mm |
| Width | 1,666 mm | 1,641 mm |
| Height | 1,491 mm | 1,478 mm |
| Wheelbase | 62,230 mm | 2,421 mm |
| Curb weight | 860 – 890 kg | 929 – 940 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.