Holden Combo (2002 – 2012) vs Honda CR-V (2002 – 2004): specs compared
The Honda CR-V is the more powerful of the two, with up to 110 hp against 88 hp. The Holden Combo uses less fuel, from 6.5 L/100 km against 9.1 L/100 km. It is the lighter car, from 1,200 kg against 1,360 kg. At 4,559 mm, the Honda CR-V is 236 mm longer than the Holden Combo.
| Specification |
Holden
Combo
2002 – 2012
|
Honda
CR-V
2002 – 2004
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | Australia | Japan |
| Documented years | 2002 – 2012 | 2002 – 2004 |
| Body style | — | — |
| Variants | 1 | 2 |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Drive | FWD | AWD |
| Gearbox | Manual | Automatic · Manual |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 88 hp | 150 hp |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 192 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | — | 10.0 – 12.0 s |
| Top speed | — | 167 – 177 km/h |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 6.5 L/100 km | 9.1 – 9.3 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,323 mm | 4,559 mm |
| Width | 1,892 mm | 1,781 mm |
| Height | 1,801 mm | 1,709 mm |
| Wheelbase | — | 2,629 mm |
| Curb weight | 1,200 kg | 1,360 – 1,370 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.