Holden Captiva (2016 – 2018) vs Mazda CX-5 (2016 – 2025): specs compared
Both offer around 190 hp at most. The Mazda CX-5 uses less fuel, from 5.4 L/100 km against 7.9 L/100 km. It is the lighter car, from 1,420 kg against 1,712 kg. At 4,674 mm, the Holden Captiva is 130 mm longer than the Mazda CX-5.
| Specification |
Holden
Captiva
2016 – 2018
|
Mazda
CX-5
2016 – 2025
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | Australia | Japan |
| Documented years | 2016 – 2018 | 2016 – 2025 |
| Body style | — | — |
| Variants | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel | Petrol, Diesel | Diesel, Petrol |
| Drive | FWD · AWD | AWD |
| Gearbox | Automatic · Manual | Automatic · Manual |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 167 – 190 hp | 150 – 190 hp |
| Torque | 230 – 400 Nm | 196 – 2,028 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | — | 9.0 – 11.0 s |
| Top speed | — | 190 – 208 km/h |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 7.9 – 10.7 L/100 km | 5.4 – 6.8 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,674 mm | 4,544 mm |
| Width | 1,849 mm | 1,839 mm |
| Height | 1,727 mm | 1,689 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,708 mm | 2,700 mm |
| Curb weight | 1,712 – 1,974 kg | 1,420 – 1,605 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.