Caterham Seven 160 (2013) vs Mitsubishi Space Star (2013 – 2017): specs compared
Both offer around 80 hp at most. The Caterham Seven 160 is quicker, reaching 100 km/h in 6.7 s against 11.7 s. The Mitsubishi Space Star has the higher top speed: 180 km/h against 161 km/h. It uses less fuel, from 4.0 L/100 km against 4.9 L/100 km. The Caterham Seven 160 is the lighter car, from 490 kg against 845 kg.
| Specification |
Caterham
Seven 160
2013
|
Mitsubishi
Space Star
2013 – 2017
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | United Kingdom | Japan |
| Documented years | 2013 | 2013 – 2017 |
| Body style | — | — |
| Variants | 1 | 4 |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Drive | RWD | FWD |
| Gearbox | Manual | Automatic · Manual |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 81 hp | 71 – 80 hp |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 88 – 106 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.7 s | 11.7 – 13.6 s |
| Top speed | 161 km/h | 172 – 180 km/h |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 4.9 L/100 km | 4.0 – 4.4 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | — | 3,711 mm |
| Width | — | 1,666 mm |
| Height | — | 1,491 mm |
| Wheelbase | — | 2,451 mm |
| Curb weight | 490 kg | 845 – 865 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.
More comparisons
Caterham Seven 160 vs Volkswagen e-UP!Caterham Seven 160 vs DR MOTOR dr cityCROSSCaterham Seven 160 vs Smart Electric DriveCaterham Seven 160 vs Smart Electric DriveCaterham Seven 160 vs Smart fortwoCaterham Seven 160 vs Smart fortwoCaterham Seven 160 vs Smart fortwo CabrioCaterham Seven 160 vs Suzuki Jimny