Fastest-accelerating Mazda models

The Mazda models with the quickest 0–100 km/h sprint.

  1. 1 Mazda RX-7 Mazda RX-7 1992 – 2002 · 2.6L Rotary TT RWD (255 HP) 255 hp 0–100 km/h5.7 s
  2. 2 Mazda CX-60 Mazda CX-60 2022 – present · 2.5L Skyactiv PHEV 8AT AWD (328 HP) 328 hp 0–100 km/h5.8 s
  3. 3 Mazda 3 MPS / MAZDASPEED 3 Mazda 3 MPS / MAZDASPEED 3 2009 – 2013 · 2.3L DISI Turbo 6MT FWD (260 HP) 260 hp 0–100 km/h6.1 s
  4. 4 Mazda 6 / Atenza Sedan Mazda 6 / Atenza Sedan 2006 – 2007 · 2.3L DISI Turbo 6MT (260 HP) 260 hp 0–100 km/h6.6 s
  5. 5 Mazda MX-5 / Miata Mazda MX-5 / Miata 2015 – 2019 · 2.0L Skyactiv-G 155 6AT RWD (155 HP) 155 hp 0–100 km/h7.3 s
  6. 6 Mazda 6e Mazda 6e 2025 – present · 68.8 KWh RWD (258 HP) 258 hp 0–100 km/h7.6 s
  7. 7 Mazda 3 / Axela Hatchback Mazda 3 / Axela Hatchback 2013 – 2016 · 2.5L SKYACTIV-G 6AT FWD (184 HP) 184 hp 0–100 km/h7.9 s
  8. 8 Mazda 626 Hatchback Mazda 626 Hatchback 1991 – 1998 · 2.5i V6 5MT FWD (165 HP) 165 hp 0–100 km/h8.5 s
  9. 9 Mazda Xedos 9 Mazda Xedos 9 1993 – 2001 · 2.5L V6 4AT FWD (167 HP) 167 hp 0–100 km/h8.6 s
  10. 10 Mazda 2 / Demio Mazda 2 / Demio 2014 – 2019 · 1.5L SKYACTIV-G 6MT FWD (115 HP) 115 hp 0–100 km/h8.7 s
  11. 11 Mazda 323 Sedan Mazda 323 Sedan 1989 – 1991 · 1.9L 5MT FWD (103 HP) 103 hp 0–100 km/h8.9 s
  12. 12 Mazda 5 / Premacy Mazda 5 / Premacy 2008 – 2010 · 2.0L 6MT FWD (145 HP) 145 hp 0–100 km/h10.2 s
  13. 13 Mazda BT-50 Mazda BT-50 2006 – 2011 · 2.5L CD 5MT 4x2 (143 HP) - Single Cab 143 hp 0–100 km/h10.4 s
  14. 14 Mazda Tribute Mazda Tribute 2001 – 2007 · 3.0L V6 4AT FWD (203 HP) 203 hp 0–100 km/h10.5 s
  15. 15 Mazda 121 Mazda 121 1991 – 1998 · 1.3L 5MT FWD (72 HP) 72 hp 0–100 km/h11.4 s
  16. 16 Mazda Biante Mazda Biante 2008 – 2018 · 2.0L 2WD 6AT (151 HP) 151 hp 0–100 km/h12.7 s
  17. 17 Mazda B Series / Bravo Dual Cab Mazda B Series / Bravo Dual Cab 1999 – 2006 · 2.5L TD 5MT AWD (109 HP) 109 hp 0–100 km/h23.1 s

Each model appears once, with its best version. Figures are manufacturer data from the CarVariables catalog; values that are clearly wrong in the source data are left out.

More rankings for these cars

Related rankings

All rankings